Daniel's 483-year Prophecy
by Wayne D. Turner
From BibleTrack
Copyright 2003-2026

We find a fascinating prophecy by Daniel in Daniel 9:24-27 (see notes).

24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.
25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.
26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

The whole prophecy found here deals with what is commonly called the "Seventy weeks of Daniel." We'll briefly touch on the entire "seventy weeks" in this document, but for a full understanding of the entire period of "seventy weeks," consult the notes found on that passage in the BibleTrack commentary. Here, we're going to look at the section of this prophecy that begins with a decree and ends with the Messiah.

First of all, a look at the word "weeks" is in order regarding this passage. The Hebrew word for "weeks" is "shaw-boo´-ah." This is the general Hebrew word for a group of seven - seven of anything (days, weeks, years). So, these "weeks" in Daniel 9:24-27 are referencing a period of groups of seven years - not seven days. It's just the way they talked back then. This usage is further validated inasmuch as Daniel was contemplating the meaning of the "70 years" of Jeremiah's prophecy at the time of the appearance of Gabriel here in Daniel 9:2 (see notes). Jeremiah's prophecy is first seen in Jeremiah 25:1-14 (see notes). Based upon that linkage, there's no question that Daniel is issuing a prophecy concerning a period of 70 years.

Now let's understand verse 24. This prophecy concerns 70 weeks (groups of 7 years or 490 years) of Jewish prophecy to fulfill the six conditions of verse 24; these will be realized for the first time in the millennium (the 1000-year period immediately following the 7-year tribulation). Daniel is made to understand that this criteria is not to be met at the conclusion of Jeremiah's prophesied 70 years of exile, but rather seven times longer than that - 490 years.

The six conditions to be fulfilled with regard to Israel in verse 24 are:

Now, let's do the math in verse 25. Understanding each week to be 7 years, we have (7 x 7) + (62 x 7) = 483 years between two events. What are these two events? The first event is the decree that would result in the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem. We'll talk more about that later. The second event is the appearance of the Messiah. I am completely confident that the time lapse between these two events was exactly 483 years. HOW DID HE KNOW THAT? God told him in this vision. But wait! There's more! In verse 26, his vision reveals that after that (62 x 7) period (the end of the 483 years) the Messiah would be cut off. Daniel saw the crucifixion of Jesus, the Messiah! In that same verse he saw the destruction of the temple after that in 70 A.D. approximately 40 years later; it's a remarkable vision.

That being said, there are some differences of opinion regarding the exact beginning and ending points of this prophecy. It is most common for commentators to embrace one view as opposed to another - declining to make his readers aware of the controversy. Here, I'll attempt to show you the pertinent data regarding all three of the most prominent views on the issue and let my readers see the relevant math involved.

Position #1 (quite popular) Position #2 (Jehovah Witnesses and others) Position #3 (not widely taught)
483 years x 360-day years (prophetic years) = 173,880 = 476 years x 365-day solar years
483 solar years beginning 454 B.C.
483 solar years from 457 B.C. to 27 A.D. which equates to the beginning of the ministry of Jesus.
Neh. 2:1 (445 B.C.) to Crucifixion of Jesus in 32 A.D. = 476 years Neh. 2:1 marks the beginning in the 20th year of Artaxerxes, but includes a co-regent position for 9 years while his father was leading the army in foreign lands, thus making it 454 B.C. Ezra was commissioned to go to Jerusalem to rebuild in Ezra 7:8, which equates to 457 B.C. The decree included the rebuilding of the wall in Jerusalem according to Ezra 9:9.

Problem #1: The rendering of 360-day prophetic years without compensation for leap years
Problem #2: It is virtually indisputable that the crucifixion took place in 30 A.D. - not 32 A.D.

Problem: While this does calculate to a 30 A.D. crucifixion, there is no record (Biblical or historical) that Artaxerxes shared a reign with his father, thus making 454 B.C. a very uncertain beginning.
Problem: While Ezra embarked upon his mission with a decree to rebuild the walls, the work had stalled until Nehemiah received his decree in 445 B.C.

To summarize and choose:

There is no question in my mind that 483 years is the time frame between two events. I'm not comfortable with the 360-day years theory (Position #1) since it is a fact that the Jews had leap years to compensate for those. In addition, the crucifixion could not have taken place in 32 A.D.

While the math works with position #2, still there is no evidence that Artaxerxes actually began his reign earlier than 464 B.C., thus making his 20th year 445 B.C. This position requires us to accept an undocumented premise.

Position #3 is not widely taught, but it does contain all of the elements necessary to be a viable position. The 7th years of Artaxerxes calculates to 457 B.C. The ending point is rendered in Daniel 9:25 as "...unto the Messiah the Prince..." That can certainly refer to the beginning of the public ministry of Jesus in 27 A.D. rather than the crucifixion in 30 A.D.

Therefore, it appears that the most viable solution to our 483-year prophecy is that of position #3.